Legal Opinion

Jaffee v. Commissioner

United States Board of Tax Appeals

Decided November 29, 1929No. Docket Nos. 26587-26590Published

1. Petitioner held to be transferees of the assets of Schwartz & Jaffee, Inc., within the meaning of section 280 of the Revenue Act of 1926. 2. Henry Cappellini et al.,14 B.T.A. 1269, followed.

1Opinion of the Court

CHARLES D. JAFFEE, PETITIONER, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, RESPONDENT.

LOUIS J. JAFFEE, PETITIONER, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, RESPONDENT.

JULIUS SCHWARTZ, PETITIONER, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, RESPONDENT.

HARRY H. SCHWARTZ, PETITIONER, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, RESPONDENT.

Jaffee v. Commissioner

Docket Nos. 26587-26590.

United States Board of Tax Appeals

18 B.T.A. 372; 1929 BTA LEXIS 2064;

November 29, 1929, Promulgated

1. Petitioner held to be transferees of the assets of Schwartz & Jaffee, Inc., within the meaning of section 280 of the Revenue Act of 1926.

2.…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Cappellini v. CommissionerUnited States Board of Tax Appeals · 1929
  2. Costanzo v. CommissionerUnited States Board of Tax Appeals · 1929
  3. Jaffee v. CommissionerUnited States Board of Tax Appeals · 1929
  4. Brewer v. CommissionerUnited States Board of Tax Appeals · 1929
  5. Jaffee v. CommissionerUnited States Board of Tax Appeals · 1929

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API