Legal Opinion

Bosley v. THE CHUBB INSTITUTE

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided May 25, 2007No. Civil Action 04-CV-4598PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM & ORDER

SURRICK, District Judge.

Presently before the Court is Plaintiffs’ Motion For Leave To File Amended Pleading (Doc. No. 34) and Plaintiffs’ Renewed Motion For Leave To File Amend ed Pleading (Doc. No. 86). For the following reasons, Plaintiffs’ Motions will be denied.

I. BACKGROUND

This case arises out of Plaintiffs’ claim that Defendant The Chubb Institute (“TCI”) misclassified Admissions Representatives as exempt employees, not entitled to overtime pay, under the Fair Labor Standards Act (“FLSA”), 29 U.S.C. § 201 et seq. (Doc. No. 1 at 1.) Plaintiffs contend that they are…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  2. In Re Burlington Coat Factory Securities Litigation. P. Gregory Buchanan, Jacob Turner and Ronald AbramoffCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1997
  3. Christianson v. Colt Industries Operating Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
  4. Semtek International Inc. v. Lockheed Martin Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2001
  5. Costello v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1961

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Attanasio v. Community Health Systems Inc.District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2012
  2. Bamgbose v. Delta-T Group, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2010
  3. Great Western Mining & Mineral Co. v. ADR Options, Inc.District Court, D. New Jersey · 2012
  4. Jackson v. Art of Life, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2011
  5. ALLEN v. STATE CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION AT SOMERSET DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONSDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2025

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API