Legal Opinion

Tritschler v. Tritschler

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided July 14, 1921No. Appeal, No. 38Published

Appeal, No. 38, Oct. T., 1920, by defendant, from judgment of C. P. Lehigb County, June T., 1917, No. 37, on verdict for plaintiff in the case of Louisa Tritschler, Executrix of. Charles Tritschler, deceased, v. Louis P. Tritschler, attorney in fact for heirs of Henry Tritschler, Sr., deceased. Assumpsit to recover payment of balance of amount due on sale of real estate. Before Grom an, P. J. The facts are stated in the opinion of the Superior Court.

Read the full summary

Appeal, No. 38, Oct. T., 1920, by defendant, from judgment of C. P. Lehigb County, June T., 1917, No. 37, on verdict for plaintiff in the case of Louisa Tritschler, Executrix of. Charles Tritschler, deceased, v. Louis P. Tritschler, attorney in fact for heirs of Henry Tritschler, Sr., deceased. Assumpsit to recover payment of balance of amount due on sale of real estate. Before Grom an, P. J. The facts are stated in the opinion of the Superior Court. Verdict for plaintiff for one thousand dollars and judgment thereon. Defendant appealed. Error assigned, among others, was the refusal of…

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Porter, J.,

The rights of these parties are dependent upon the construction of the will of Henry Tritschler, Sr., who *150died in December, 1874. His will, after directing tbe payment of Ms debts, contained tbe following provisions material to the question here presented: “Second; I order and direct that my two sons Henry and Charles shall each have the sum of fifteen hundred dollars to be first paid to them out of my estate as an advance before any other legacies or bequests herein given are paid, to be paid to them on each of them respectively arriving at the age of twenty-five years.”…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. High's AppealSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1853

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API