Legal Opinion
Dane County v. McCartney
Court of Appeals of Wisconsin
Decided January 22, 1992No. 91-1407PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtCane, P.J.
Jerry McCartney appeals a judgment in favor of Dane County holding that sec. 46.23(3)(d), Stats., does not guarantee McCartney continued employment with the Dane County Department of Human Services with the same seniority, status and benefits, and dismissing McCartney's counterclaim against the county alleging due process violations. McCartney argues that sec. 46.23(3) (d) unconditionally guarantees his continued employment with the same seniority, status and benefits as he previously enjoyed, as a protection during the social services department's reorganization. He also contends that his…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Grams v. BossWisconsin Supreme Court · 1980
- State Ex Rel. Newspapers Inc. v. ShowersWisconsin Supreme Court · 1987
- Glen Misek and Richard J. Krakowski v. The City of Chicago, a Municipal Corporation, Harold Washington, Charles A. Pounian and Susan L. WeedCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1986
- Vincent R. Duffy v. Brian J. Sarault, Etc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1989
- Gonzalez v. TeskeyCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1990
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Dorothy J. Listenbee v. City of Milwaukee and Milwaukee City Service CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1992
- Association of State Prosecutors v. Milwaukee CountyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1996
- Heyden v. Safeco Title InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1993
- Brown v. State Dep't of Children & FamiliesCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2012
- Schulz v. GREEN COUNTY, STATE OF WIS.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2011
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.