Legal Opinion

Flury v. Twin Cities Dairy Co.

Washington Supreme Court

Decided November 9, 1925No. 19465. Department OnePublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFullerton, J.

— This action was instituted as an action at law by the respondents, Flury and Ineicken, to recover from the appellant for milk sold and delivered, of the value and of the agreed price of $442.30. The appellant, in its answer to the complaint, set up, as an affirmative defense and cross-complaint, that it was a corporation, organized under the laws of the State of Washington, with a capital stock of seventy-five thousand dollars; that the respondents, at the time of its organization, subscribed to its capital stock in the sum of five hundred dollars, giving to it their promissory note in that…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Cox v. DickieWashington Supreme Court · 1908
  2. Denny Hotel Co. v. SchramWashington Supreme Court · 1893
  3. Cole v. Satsop RailroadWashington Supreme Court · 1894
  4. Gordon v. CummingsWashington Supreme Court · 1914
  5. Jones v. DodgeSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1911

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Witner v. Twin Cities Dairy Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1925
  2. Witner v. Twin Cities Dairy Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1925

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API