Legal Opinion

Comer v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided November 14, 1917No. 8995PublishedCited by 12 opinions

Indictment for sodomy; from Muscogee superior court — Judge Howard. June 18, 1917.

1Opinion of the CourtBroyles, P. J.

1. The offense of sodomy can be committed per os, or otherwise than per anum. Herring v. State, 119 Ga. 709 (46 S. E. 876); White v. State, 136 Ga. 158 (71 S. E. 135), s. c. 9 Ga. App. 307 (71 S. E. 499); Jones v. State, 17 Ga. App. 825 (88 S. E. 712).

2. While criminal statutes must be strictly construed, yet, under the construction given to section 373 of the Penal Code of 1910 by the Supreme Court in Herring v. State and in White v. State, supra, and necessarily ' adopted by this court in White v. State and in Jones v. State, supra, it follows, as a reasonable, logical, and unescapable…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Herring v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1904
  2. White v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1911
  3. Jones v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1916
  4. White v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1911

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Rose v. LockeSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  2. Koontz v. the PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1927
  3. Riley v. GarrettSupreme Court of Georgia · 1963
  4. Perryman v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1940
  5. Barton v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1949

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API