State v. Chester

CRICHTON, J.,

additionally concurs and assigns reasons.

IT agree with the majority that the prose Motion to Waive Right to Habeas Corpus Review, filed directly with this Court, wherein Chester seeks to “immediately proceed to execution” substantively presents a claim for post-conviction relief and thus, La. C.Cr.P. art. 925 bars consideration by us: “[Ajpplications for post-conviction relief shall be filed in the parish in which the petitioner was convicted.” Chester’s motion is also not properly before this Court pursuant to Segura v. Frank, 93-1271 (La. 1/14/94), 630 So.2d 714, 725…