Legal Opinion

Carroll v. Finova Capital Corp.

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided February 11, 2004No. A03A2325PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Smith, Chief Judge.

Roy A. Carroll d/b/a Animal Care Clinic (collectively “Carroll”) appeals from the grant of summary judgment entered in favor of Finova Capital Corporation. Because we conclude that the trial court entered a sua sponte summary judgment without providing Carroll with a full opportunity to address the basis on which the court entered its order, we reverse.

Finova filed this action against Carroll alleging that it had provided financing to Carroll in connection with the leasing of office equipment marketed by Recomm Operations, Inc. and others. Finova further alleged that after…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Dixon v. Metropolitan Atlanta Rapid Transit AuthorityCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2000
  2. Aycock v. CalkCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1996
  3. Rothstein v. BrooksCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1974
  4. Studenic v. BirkCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2003

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Fluke v. WestermanCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2005
  2. Larizza v. LarizzaSupreme Court of Georgia · 2010
  3. LaRizza v. LaRizzaSupreme Court of Georgia · 2010
  4. McIntyre v. MossCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2019
  5. Jennifer McIntyre v. Jeffrey Moss, TrusteeCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API