Shealy v. South Carolina Electric & Gas Co.
Supreme Court of South Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
Ness, Justice:
S. C. E. & G. appeals an order construing the provisions of a deed allowing respondents, Shealy, et al., to continue in possession and control of certain realty on Lake Murray and further requiring S. C. E. & G. to compensate respondents for improvements which they made to the property. We reverse.
The deed here was executed due to the development of the Lake Murray dam and hydroelectric plant. Frank W. Shealy conveyed a 747 acre tract to Lexington Water Power Company for $12,196.00 on July 22,1927. The pertinent portion of the granting clause in the deed provides:
“... [H]ave…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Glasgow v. GlasgowSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1952
- Southern Railway Co. v. DaySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1926
- Citizens & Southern National Bank v. Modern Homes Construction Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1966
- Stylecraft, Inc. v. ThomasSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1968
- County of Abbeville v. KnoxSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1976
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Hunt v. South Carolina Forestry CommissionCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2004
- First Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. FinnSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1989
- Bennett v. Investors Title InsuranceCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2006
- Miller ex rel. Grand Strand Diversified, Inc. v. GandeeCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1985