Legal Opinion

Dyo v. Winningham

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided June 19, 1930No. 2431PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPedphrey, C. J.

A previous motion for rehearing was overruled in this cause, but later such order was-set aside and appellee granted leave to file an amended motion, in which, as a further ground, appellee contends that we committed efror in reversing and rendering judgment as to appellants North Mexico Mining Company and H. Kishi, the plea of failure of consideration not having been verified by them or on their behalf.

The answer filed by appellants was verified as follows:

“The State of Texas, County of El Paso.
“Before me, the undersigned authority, on this day personally appeared Tsutomu Dyo, one of…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Drew v. Harrison & Bros.Texas Supreme Court · 1854
  2. Farris v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1923
  3. Citizens' Garage Co. v. WilsonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1923
  4. St. Louis, S. F. & T. Ry. Co. v. WallCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1914
  5. Jones v. AustinCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1894

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Winningham v. DyoTexas Commission of Appeals · 1932
  2. Exchange Nat. Bank v. ParsonsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1938

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API