People v. Felix
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtGriffin, J.
Defendants and appellants were jointly charged with a felony, to wit, possession of a blackjack. They were tried without a jury and found guilty. Their appeal is taken from the judgment of conviction. But one point is made upon this appeal and that is that the evidence is insufficient as to any of the defendants to justify the conviction. The defendants concede that the instrument found in the car was a blackjack as defined by the Dangerous Weapons Control Law of 1923, as amended (Deering’s Gen. Laws, 1937, vol. 1, Act 1970, p. 993 [Stats. 1923, p. 695]).
The evidence shows that on the night…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- People v. GonzalesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1925
- People v. BartleyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1910
- People v. Del PradoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942
3Cited by7 opinions
- People v. WissenfeldCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
- People v. GuyetteCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964
- People v. BurnettCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967
- People v. GuyetteCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964
- People v. EricksonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.