Legal Opinion

Central General Hospital v. American Arbitration Ass'n

New York Supreme Court

Decided May 23, 1977PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBernard F. McCaffrey, J.

The threshold issue to be determined in this matter is whether, under the provisions of sections 670 and 671 of the Insurance Law, Central General Hospital, as health services provider to Keith Hersey, and assignee of the health benefits, has the sole right under the New York Automobile Reparations Act (no-fault) (Insurance Law, § 670), to the exclusion of the infant petitioner, Keith Hersey, who was comatose at the time and his father who, at *517the direction of the hospital admitting clerk, signed the assignment of medical benefits, to arbitrate this matter.

Thus, on September 20, 1976, Keith…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Aster Agency, Inc. v. StateNew York Court of Claims · 1958
  2. A. E. Ottaviano, Inc. v. StateNew York Court of Claims · 1964
  3. In re the Arbitration between Rosenblum & Government Employees InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1975

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Vazquez v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.Civil Court of the City of New York · 1982
  2. Rehab Medical Care of New York, P. C. v. Travelers InsuranceCivil Court of the City of New York · 2000

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API