Legal Opinion
Hinojosa v. Joslyn Corp.
Appellate Court of Illinois
Decided May 2, 1994No. 1-91-1991PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Manning
On August 1988, plaintiffs, Elizabeth C. Hinojosa and Anna T. Obniski, were discharged from their jobs as factory workers by defendant Joslyn Corporation, their employer. Plaintiffs filed a breach of contract action against Joslyn.
During the pendency of the lawsuit, plaintiffs served the Illinois Department of Employment Security (IDES) with a subpoena duces tecum to produce documents pertaining to their unemployment benefits from Joslyn Corporation. On July 30, 1990, IDES returned the subpoena unanswered explaining that section 1900 of the Unemployment Insurance Act (Act) (Ill. Rev. Stat.…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Garcia v. Hynes & Howes Real Estate, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1975
- People v. ShukovskyIllinois Supreme Court · 1989
- People v. GoinsIllinois Supreme Court · 1988
- Smith v. Illinois Valley Ice Cream Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1959
- Simpson v. Oil Transfer CorporationDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 1948
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Haverly v. Kaytec, Inc.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1999
- Clemons v. Mechanical Devices Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1997
- Buckholtz v. MacNeal HospitalAppellate Court of Illinois · 2000
- Stutsman County v. WesterengNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2001
- AIG Specialty Insurance Company, As Assignee and Subrogee v. McColganDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2023
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.