Legal Opinion

Kneeland-Bigelow Co. v. Michigan Central Railroad

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided November 11, 1919No. Docket No. 78PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Appeal from Bay; Houghton, J. Bill by the Kneeland-Bigelow Company and another against the Michigan Central Railroad Company and another for a temporary injunction and the specific performance of a contract. From a decree dismissing the bill for want of jurisdiction, plaintiffs appeal.

1Opinion of the CourtSteere, J.

This matter was heard in the circuit court of Bay county, in chancery, on a motion of plaintiffs for preliminary injunction to restrain a claimed excessive rate charge for transportation of logs, together with a motion of the Michigan railroad commission to dismiss plaintiffs’ bill as to it and a motion of the Michigan Central Railroad Company for dismissal of said bill on grounds set forth in its answer then'on file. The motions were argued and submitted *548together. Plaintiffs appeal from a decree dismissing their bill of complaint on the ground that the court was without jurisdiction to grant…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. The Kaiser Wilhelm IICourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1917
  2. Perkins v. RogersIndiana Supreme Court · 1871
  3. Marshall v. BushNebraska Supreme Court · 1918

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Stinson v. New York Life Ins. Co.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1948
  2. New York Life Ins. Co. v. DurhamCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1948
  3. Palmer v. PokornyMichigan Supreme Court · 1922
  4. Greenville Enterprise, Inc. v. JenningsSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1947
  5. Meier v. SchmidtNebraska Supreme Court · 1948

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API