Legal Opinion

State v. Howard

Hamilton County Municipal Court

Decided May 18, 1983No. 83 CRB 9789PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHogan, J.

The defendant herein is charged with soliciting, a violation of R.C. 2907.24(A), which states as follows:

“No person shall solicit another to engage with such other person in sexual activity for hire.” (Emphasis added.)

The dialogue between the undercover policeman and the defendant took place' on May 7, 1983 at approximately 3:00 a.m. on Vine Street. The policeman approached the defendant standing on or near the curb and said, “Are you dating?” The defendant responded, “Do you have any money?” The policeman’s response was, “Is $15.00 enough?” The defendant replied affirmatively. The officer’s…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Sorrells v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
  2. State v. Dutton Drugs, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1965
  3. State v. McDonaldOhio Court of Appeals · 1972

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. State v. ShortOhio Court of Appeals · 2017
  2. State v. SwannOhio Court of Appeals · 2001
  3. State v. JaliOhio Court of Appeals · 2020
  4. State v. BennettOhio Court of Appeals · 2015
  5. State v. AndersonSupreme Court of Iowa · 2000

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API