Legal Opinion

Clark v. Crown Drug Co.

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided December 14, 1940PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtTatlow, P. J.

The parties will be referred to in this opinion as plaintiff and defendants.

The learned trial judge rendered a memorandum opinion in which ■he stated the issues and found the facts, which we approve, as follows:

“Plaintiffs in this case seek to enjoin the defendant from so conducting its business, that is making illegal sales of liquor, so as to create unfair and illegal competition against the plaintiffs; plaintiff suing for himself and practically all of the other tap room operators in the City of Springfield.

‘1 The evidence shows that the defendant has sold liquor on telephone orders and…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. New State Ice Co. v. LiebmannSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
  2. Frost v. Corporation Comm'n of Okla.Supreme Court of the United States · 1929
  3. Alabama Power Co. v. IckesSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  4. Corporation Comm'n of Okla. v. LoweSupreme Court of the United States · 1930
  5. State v. WingfieldSupreme Court of Missouri · 1893

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Clark v. Crown Drug Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1941

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API