Legal Opinion

Kiehl v. Holliday

Montana Supreme Court

Decided November 29, 1926No. 5,995PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Callaway

The plaintiff, occupant and lawfully in possession of certain lands in Wheatland county, sued the defendant for herding and pasturing thereon 2,000 head of sheep belonging to defendant.

It was alleged by plaintiff and denied by defendant that the defendant had “wrongfully, negligently, unlawfully and maliciously and without right or authority and without consent of plaintiff, herded and pastured said sheep on the said premises with result that the grass and herbage was eaten off and destroyed. ’ ’

The jury returned a verdict for plaintiff for $25. Plaintiff in due time claimed his costs by…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. R. M. Cobban Realty Co. v. DonlanMontana Supreme Court · 1915
  2. Monroe v. CannonMontana Supreme Court · 1900
  3. Power Mercantile Co. v. Moore Mercantile Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1918
  4. Bjornson v. RostadSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1912

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Hamilton v. RockMontana Supreme Court · 1948
  2. Phoenix Title and Trust Company v. SmithArizona Supreme Court · 1966
  3. Martel v. Hall Oil Co.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1927
  4. Norum v. Queen City Oil Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1928

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API