Legal Opinion

Dougan v. State

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided November 4, 2003No. SC 85274PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RICHARD B. TEITELMAN, Judge.

Mark Dougan appeals the motion court’s dismissal of his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief. Although he was convicted of a felony, Dougan was not sentenced to incarceration and has not been in the custody of the department of corrections. The motion court dismissed the Rule 29.15 motion because Dougan “has never been incarcerated.... ”

Dougan met the requirements of Rule 29.15 because he was convicted of a felony after trial and filed a timely notice of appeal. Dougan timely filed his Rule 29.15 motion because he did so within 90 days after the date the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. State v. KellyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1998
  2. Jackson v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1994

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Watson v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 2017
  2. Fred Silver, Movant/Appellant v. State of MissouriMissouri Court of Appeals · 2015
  3. BRIAN L. MCDANIEL v. STATE OF MISSOURIMissouri Court of Appeals · 2020
  4. Layette C. Williams v. State of MissouriMissouri Court of Appeals · 2022
  5. T'Oddre D. Hudson v. State of MissouriMissouri Court of Appeals · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API