Legal Opinion
Grant v. State
Supreme Court of Arkansas
Decided March 15, 1902PublishedCited by 2 opinions
Appeal from Greene Circuit Court. Felix G. Taylor, Judge. The demurrer to the indictment should have been sustained. Sand. & H. Dig., § 1855; 46 N. W. 97. The indictment should have alleged the filing of the depositions. 63 Ark. 513. ■ The indictment was sufficient. Sand. & H. Dig., §§ 1855, 3075, 3076; 5 Ark. 513.
1Opinion of the CourtWood, J.
At the fall term, 1899, of the Greene county circuit court, the grand jury returned against appellant the following .indictment:
“Greene County Circuit Court, Fall Term, 1899. The state of Arkansas against Jim Grant. Indictment. The grand jury of Greene county, in the name and by the authority of the state of Arkansas, accuse Jim Grant of the crime of destroying public records, committed as follows, to-wit: The said Jim Grant, in the county aforesaid, on the 5th day of April, 1899, did unlawfully and feloniously steal, take away, withdraw, avoid and destroy a part of the records of the Greene,…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Keoun v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1897
3Cited by2 opinions
- Holland v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1914
- Jacobs v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1911