Legal Opinion

Kelley v. BMO Harris Bank N.A., as successor to M&I Marshall and IIsley Bank

District Court, D. Minnesota

Decided October 9, 2022No. 0:19-cv-01756Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA Douglas A. Kelley, in his capacity as the Case No. 19-cv-1756 (WMW) Trustee of the BMO Litigation Trust, Plaintiff, ORDER ON v. MOTIONS IN LIMINE BMO Harris Bank N.A., as successor to M&I Marshall and Ilsley Bank, Defendant. This matter is before the Court on motions in limine filed by Plaintiff Douglas A. Kelley, in his capacity as the Trustee of the BMO Litigation Trust (hereinafter, Kelley or the Trustee), and Defendant BMO Harris Bank N.A. (BMO Harris). (Dkts. 176, 194, 198, 202, 204.) For the reasons addressed below, the parties’ motions…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Emich Motors Corp. v. General Motors Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1951
  2. McDermott, Inc. v. AmClydeSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  3. Frank Stevenson v. Union Pacific Railroad CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2004
  4. Rick E. Clark, & Cross-Appellee v. Burlington Northern, Inc., a Corporation, & Cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1984
  5. In the Matter of Fbn Food Services, Inc., Debtor. River Bank AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1996

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API