Legal Opinion

Statkus v. Metropolitan Transit Authority

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided December 10, 1956PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCutter, J.

This is an action of tort to recover for injuries sustained by the plaintiff when alighting from a bus of the defendant. There was a verdict for the plaintiff for $14,000. The defendant filed a motion for a new trial on the grounds that the verdict was against the evidence and the weight of the evidence and that the damages were excessive. The motion was denied and the defendant duly excepted. The case is here on the defendant’s bill of exceptions.

At the argument and in its brief, the defendant did not greatly press its contention that the trial judge abused his discretion in denying a new…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Bartley v. PhillipsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1944
  2. Kinnear v. General Mills, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1941
  3. Growers Outlet, Inc. v. StoneMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1956
  4. Giblin v. Lincoln Park Amusement Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1945

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. MacCuish v. Volkswagenwerk A. G.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 1986
  2. Haven v. Town of BrimfieldMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1963
  3. Koller v. DugganMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1963
  4. Domenic T. ScanoMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1958
  5. Brogna v. Pioneer Petroleum Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1962

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API