Carlson v. Minnesota Land & Colonization Co.
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Action in the district court for Crow Wing county to determine adverse claims to certain vacant and unoccupied land. The substance of the answer is stated in the opinion. Plaintiff’s demurrer to the separate answer of defendant company was overruled. Erom a judgment, Stanton, J., adjudging title to the land to be in defendant Minnesota Land & Colonization Company, plaintiff appealed.
1Opinion of the CourtLewis, J.
Action to. determine adverse claims of title to eighty acres of land in Crow Wing county. The Minnesota Land & Colonization Company answered, and alleged that in 1905 it conveyed the premises to Ellzey by a deed which contained the reservation and exception as follows: “Reserving and excepting from said lands such as are now known, or shall hereafter be ascertained, to contain coal or iron, and also the use of such surface ground as may be necessary for mining operations, and the right of access to such reserved and excepted coal and iron lands, for the purpose of exploring, developing, and…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Kincaid v. McGowanCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1887
- Knight v. Indiana Coal & Iron Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1874
- Sanborn v. City of MinneapolisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1886
- Farrell v. HowardSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1892
3Cited by10 opinions
- Washburn v. Gregory Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1914
- Buck v. WalkerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1911
- U.S. Bank Ass'n v. KoenigNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2002
- Resler v. RogersSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1965
- Vang v. MountSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1974
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.