Legal Opinion

Sulzbacker v. J. Cawthra & Co.

New York Court of Common Pleas

Decided December 2, 1895PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Actioii by Joseph H. Sulzbacker against J. ■Cawthra & Co., Limited.

1Per curiam

Defendant’s motion to reduce the amount for which the attachment was granted is not inconsistent with its appeal from the order denying the motion to vacate the attachment Both motions were availed of by the defendant as of right Hence this motion for dismissal of the appeal should be denied, with $10 costs.

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. Brandley v. American Butter Co.New York Supreme Court · 1908
  2. Brandley v. American Butter Co.New York Supreme Court · 1908