Legal Opinion

Haynes v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided December 15, 1906PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Appeal from the District Court of Dallas County. Tried below before Hon. Thos. F. Hash.

1Opinion of the Court

BOOKHOUT, Associate Justice.

This suit was instituted by the State of Texas to foreclose certain tax liens alleged to exist against lot 4, block L, of Cockrell’s Fairland Addition to the city of Dallas.

The defendant Haynes answered by a general and special exception; by general denial, and further averred that he purchased the lot subsequent to the time of the accrual of said pretended liens and without notice of same. The cause was tried before the court without a jury upon an agreed statement of facts and judgment rendered in favor of plaintiff. The defendant excepted to the judgment and…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Morris & Cummings v. State ex rel. GussettTexas Supreme Court · 1884
  2. Eustis v. City of HenriettaTexas Supreme Court · 1897
  3. Nolan County v. StateTexas Supreme Court · 1891
  4. State of Texas v. FarmerTexas Supreme Court · 1900
  5. Hope Mutual Insurance v. FlynnSupreme Court of Missouri · 1866

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Franz v. Katy Independent School District, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2000
  2. Republic Ins. Co. v. Highland Park Independent School Dist. of Dallas CountyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1933
  3. Louisiana Ry. & Nav. Co. v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1927
  4. Jeff Bland Lumber & Building Co. v. Galveston, H. & S. A. R.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1919
  5. Alcorn v. MeansCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1925

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API