Legal Opinion

McCormick Harvesting Machine Co. v. Hamilton

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided February 19, 1889PublishedCited by 13 opinions

APPEAL from the Circuit Court for Richland County. The facts are stated is the opinion. The following opinion was filed February 19, 1889:

1Opinion of the CourtOeton, J.

This appeal is from the judgment of foreclosure of the following mortgage: By Peter Hamilton and Bridget, his wife, to the respondent company, on the south half of the northwest quarter of section 18, and the southeast quarter of the northeast quarter of section 14, town 10 N., range 1 W., to secure the payment of three notes given by M. J. and the said Peter and Bridget Hamilton, for §600, payable June 1, 1887; $600, payable June 1, 18S8; and for $600, payable January 1, 1889,— dated November 20, 1885. The defendant Bridget Hamilton answered the complaint in the action by setting up…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Eadie v. . SlimmonNew York Court of Appeals · 1862
  2. Harris v. CarmodyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1881
  3. Schultz v. CulbertsonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1879
  4. Watkins v. BrantWisconsin Supreme Court · 1879
  5. Fay v. OatleyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1858

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Schultz v. CatlinWisconsin Supreme Court · 1891
  2. Martin v. EvansSupreme Court of Alabama · 1909
  3. Hartford Fire Insurance v. Kirkpatrick, Dunn & Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1895
  4. Weiser v. WelchMichigan Supreme Court · 1897
  5. Mack v. PrangWisconsin Supreme Court · 1899

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API