Legal Opinion

Wartelle v. Le Blanc

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided February 15, 1837PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Eastern Dist. ATTEAL FROM THE COURT OF THE FIRST JUDICIAL DISTRICT. This is an action of account, by one partner against another, for a balance, alleged to be due, which, the plaintiff says, has been caused through error and incorrect accounts, rendered by his co-partner, who had the principal management and control of the business.

Read the full summary

Eastern Dist. ATTEAL FROM THE COURT OF THE FIRST JUDICIAL DISTRICT. This is an action of account, by one partner against another, for a balance, alleged to be due, which, the plaintiff says, has been caused through error and incorrect accounts, rendered by his co-partner, who had the principal management and control of the business. The plaintiff claims a balance due to him, according to a ■detailed statement annexed, of four thousand two hundred and twenty-one dollars and fifty-one cents. The defendant pleaded a general denial ; and denied specially any errors or omissions, on his part, in…

1Opinion of the CourtBullard, J.

The plaintiff and appellant urges the reversal of the judgment of the court below, on the ground that an item of his account, of one hundred and seventy-one dollars and ninety-one cents, was disallowed, and, together with two others, reserved as the subject of future adjudication between the parties. This item consists of a remittance made by one Girodel, of Omoa, to the defendant, which is alleged ought to have been credited to the joint account of plaintiff and defendant.

It appears in evidence, that Le Blanc had purchased some goods here for Girodel, and paid for them. That afterwards a…

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. Lone Star Industries, Inc. v. American Chemical, Inc.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1986
  2. Chambers v. Pig Feet, Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API