Legal Opinion
State v. Carey, 88487 (6-21-2007)
Ohio Court of Appeals
Decided June 21, 2007No. 88487PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
JOURNAL ENTRY AND OPINION
{¶ 1} Appellant Caliel Carey appeals his conviction for two counts of aggravated robbery with firearm specifications and the accompanying sentence.
Carey's counsel assigns four errors for our review. In addition, Carey assigns two additional pro se assigned errors.1
{¶ 2} Having reviewed the record and pertinent law, we affirm Carey's conviction. The apposite facts follow.
Jury Trial
{¶ 3} Carey committed two separate aggravated robberies with firearms on two different victims. On April 4, 2005, at approximately 1:30 a.m., Carey robbed Sam Wingo, an admitted drug dealer.…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Blakely v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- State v. MartinOhio Court of Appeals · 1983
- State v. BradleyOhio Supreme Court · 1989
- Kimmelman v. MorrisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- State v. QuartermanOhio Court of Appeals · 2013
- State v. BakerOhio Court of Appeals · 2025
- State v. Carey, 92052 (1-29-2009)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2009