Legal Opinion
People v. Edelstein
New York Supreme Court
Decided March 30, 1979PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*1019OPINION OF THE COURT
Harold J. Rothwax, J.
The defendants move to suppress evidence obtained as the result of court-ordered electronic surveillance on the grounds that the officers who executed the warrant failed to adequately minimize the interception of communications not otherwise subject to eavesdropping. (CPL 700.30, subd 7.)
The threshold question is whether the movants have standing to invoke the statutory remedies.
In this State, the law on standing, in relation to the fruits of electronic surveillance, is asertained through a statutory cross reference between CPL 710.10 (subd 5) and CPLR…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Simmons v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Rakas v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Jones v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
- Alderman v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- State v. WilliamsWashington Supreme Court · 1980
- People v. GriffinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
- People v. SardegnaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982
- United States v. VasconcellosDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 2009
- State v. WilliamsWashington Supreme Court · 1980