Legal Opinion

O'Donohue v. Leggett

New York Supreme Court

Decided December 2, 1889PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Appeal from circuit court, New York county. Action by Joseph J. O’Donohue, Peter J. O’Donohue, and John "V". O’Donohue against Francis H. Leggett, Theodore Leggett, and Henry T. McCoun, to recover damages for an alleged breach of a contract to purchase 1,700 piculs of Free Preanger coffee. On a former trial plaintiffs recovered a verdict, and defendants appealed.

Read the full summary

Appeal from circuit court, New York county. Action by Joseph J. O’Donohue, Peter J. O’Donohue, and John "V". O’Donohue against Francis H. Leggett, Theodore Leggett, and Henry T. McCoun, to recover damages for an alleged breach of a contract to purchase 1,700 piculs of Free Preanger coffee. On a former trial plaintiffs recovered a verdict, and defendants appealed. The general term reversed the judgment, the justices filing the following opinions: “Daniels, J. The verdict was rendered for the difference between the price for which certain coffee was agreed to be purchased by the defendants and…

1Opinion of the Court

Pee Curiam.

A consideration of this case leads to the conclusion that the ■questions presented are sufficiently covered by the opinion delivered upon the former appeal. An examination of it did not disclose the existence of any additional facts or circumstances requiring a different disposition than that mentioned, and therefore the judgment should be affirmed, with costs.

2Cited by1 opinion

  1. Hirsch v. AnninAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1899

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API