Legal Opinion

Manufacturers & Builders Fire Insurance v. Mullen

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided May 20, 1896No. 6566PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Error from the district court of Douglas county. Tried below before Ferguson, J.

1Opinion of the Court

Ryan, C.

In this action there was a judgment in the district court of Douglas county upon a yerdict in favor of the defendant in error in the sum of $1,715.19 on account of defendant in error’s total loss by fire of a building insured by plaintiff in error. The only error argued is that a so-called award of $1,261.04, pleaded by answer, was not admitted in evidence. The agreement to arbitrate was in writing and the name of the defendant in error was thereto signed as follows: “Helen M. Mullen, by John S. Mullen, Atty. in Fact.” There was evidence submitted of certain acts performed by John S.…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. McPherson v. . CoxNew York Court of Appeals · 1881
  2. Scarborough v. ReynoldsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1847
  3. Michigan Central Railroad v. GougarIllinois Supreme Court · 1870
  4. Huber v. ZimmermanSupreme Court of Alabama · 1852
  5. Trout v. EmmonsIllinois Supreme Court · 1862

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Madden v. Kaiser Foundation HospitalsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
  2. Madden v. Kaiser Foundation HospitalsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
  3. Pope v. WheatleyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1932

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API