Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Govan v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided January 9, 1985No. 189-84Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partOnion, Presiding Judge

Near the commencement of its opinion today the majority states, “This Court granted appellant’s Petition for Discretionary Review to determine whether the court below erred in affirming the trial court’s decision to overrule appellant’s objection that the trial court’s charge to the jury failed to apply the law of parties to the facts of the case.” (Emphasis supplied.)

In concluding and supposedly answering appellant’s contention, the majority states, “the error of the trial court in charging on the law of parties was harmless error.” (Emphasis supplied.) Thus there seems a gap between…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Hackbarth v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1981
  2. Vaughn v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1980
  3. Seefurth v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1967
  4. Bilbrey v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1980
  5. Rasmussen v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1980

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API