Legal Opinion

Schumann v. Helberg

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided January 22, 1896PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Bill for Relief.—Appeal from the Superior Court of Cook County; the Hon. John Barton Payne, Judge, presiding. Heard in this court at the October term, 1895.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Shepard

We think the only question really involved in this appeal is the correctness of the decree that was entered by the Circuit Court for an accounting between the parties.

All of the main questions involved seem to have been fully determined by the Supreme Court when the case was there with the parties reversed, as reported in 150 Ill. 12. As it was the duty of the Superior Court to examine the opinion of the Supreme Court when it reversed the former decree herein, and conform its action to it, so it is ours to ascertain from that opinion what was there decided, now that the cause has come for the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Chickering v. FailesIllinois Supreme Court · 1862
  2. Washburn & Moen Manufacturing Co. v. Chicago Galvanized Wire Fence Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1886
  3. Helbreg v. SchumannIllinois Supreme Court · 1894
  4. Allison v. PerryIllinois Supreme Court · 1889
  5. Gould v. Elgin City Banking Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1890

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Marshall & Spencer Co. v. Peoples BankSupreme Court of Florida · 1924
  2. Conlee Constr. Co. v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1970
  3. Guarantee Gold Bond, Loan & Savings Co. v. EdwardsCourt Of Appeals Of Indian Territory · 1907
  4. Conlee Constr. Co. v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1970
  5. People v. HathawayAppellate Court of Illinois · 1902

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API