Legal Opinion

Van Antwerp v. United States

District Court, N.D. California

Decided September 21, 1936No. 19799-RPublished

1Opinion of the Court

ROCHE, District Judge.

Plaintiff taxpayer, William C. Van Antwerp, sues for a refund of $62,690.09 income tax paid for the calendar year 1928. His tax return for that year disclosed a tax due of $5,981.88 which was paid without dispute. An audit by a government agent in 1930 revealed a deficiency ($58,-124.55 tax and $4,565.54 interest) which was collected in 1931 by distraining without notice of deficiency as required by section 272(a) of the 1928 Revenue Act (26 U.S.C.A. § 272 and note).

I. The first issue arises when plaintiff asserts such collection was absolutely void because made without…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. R. H. Stearns Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
  2. United States v. MalcolmSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
  3. Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. Liberty Bank & Trust Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1932
  4. Wiser v. LawlerSupreme Court of the United States · 1903
  5. United States v. S. F. Scott & Sons, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1934

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API