Sours v. Shuler

JUSTICE, PJ.

The case turned upon two motions. The defendant Clarence R. Hosier, as administrator with the will annexed of Huldah Shuler, deceased, moved to dismiss the cause on the ground that: “The court has no jurisdiction either of the subject-matter or of the parties necessary to the contest of a will.” The defendants Lillie Shuler, Hattie Hosier and Clarence Hosier moved to quash the service of summons on them on the ground that “The action was not commenced against them and that they were not made parties until after the expiration of one year following the probate of the will of which…