Legal Opinion

Roebuck v. Brown

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided February 23, 1923PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court by

Chief Justice Sampson—

Affirming.

This is a forcible detainer proceeding. Appellant Roebuck was the tenant and Brown the landlord. The case was tried out by a justice of the peace in Newport, who found the appellant Roebuck guilty of forcible detainer, and entered a judgment accordingly. Roebuck traversed the inquisition to the circuit court. There the law and facts were submitted to the court and the circuit *12court found appellant Roebuck guilty of tbe forcible detainer of which complaint was made and entered a judgment accordingly. Roebuck filed motion and grounds for a…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. Ball v. CecilCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1941
  2. Fayette County Board of Education v. TompkinsCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1926
  3. Baker v. FullerCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1928

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API