Legal Opinion
Foster v. State
Wisconsin Supreme Court
Decided September 30, 1975No. State 169 (1974)PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtRobert W. Hansen, J.
By motion for postconviction remedy, the plaintiff in error (hereinafter referred to as the defendant), convicted on a plea of guilty to the crime of armed robbery, seeks to raise the issue of denial of speedy trial. No appeal was taken from the judgment of conviction on the plea of guilty. No motion for withdrawal of the plea of guilty was made in the trial court.
On the facts here present, we find no denial of the right of speedy trial to this defendant. On April 26, 1971, this defendant was arraigned and pled not guilty to two charges: (1) Operating an automobile without the owner’s…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Boykin v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Barker v. WingoSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Mapp v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Irvin v. DowdSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- McCarthy v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- State v. RiekkoffWisconsin Supreme Court · 1983
- MacK v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1980
- Norwood v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1976
- Hatcher v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1978
- State v. NelsonCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1982
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.