Legal Opinion

Rose v. Rose

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 8, 1952No. Civ. 19011PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

VALLÉE, J.

This is a motion to dismiss the appeal. On March 8, 1948, Eva S. Rose as plaintiff obtained an interlocutory decree of divorce from Samuel C. Rose, by which Samuel was ordered to pay Eva $75 a month for the support of their minor daughter, Jacqueline. On April 7, 1950, Eva applied for an increase of the award, for costs, and attorney fees. After a hearing the application was denied. The court did not order that Jacqueline be brought into the action nor did she take any steps to be made a party to the record. She did not appear in the action by a general guardian or by a guardian ad…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Eggert v. Pacific States Savings & Loan Co.California Supreme Court · 1942
  2. Braun v. BrownCalifornia Supreme Court · 1939
  3. Pacific States Savings & Loan Co. v. MortimerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1945

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Estate of SloanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
  2. Bates v. John Deere Co.California Court of Appeal · 1983
  3. City of Santa Cruz v. MacGregorCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
  4. Estate of ArmstrongCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1966
  5. Butterfield v. TietzCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1966

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API