Pima County v. Sabino Investing, Inc.

OPINION

LACAGNINA, Presiding Judge.

Pima County appeals from summary judgments granted in favor of third-party defendants on the county’s claim for indemnification. The county argues that a subdivider who dedicates a road to a county by subdivision plat must indemnify the county for any damages and costs required to be paid by the county arising out of ownership claims made by third parties against the county concerning the road. Because we find the indemnification was sought for a breach of warranty of title with no basis for such a claim, we affirm.

R. Porter Smith and Joanne Snow-Smith,…