Legal Opinion

Ex Parte Beverly

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided June 22, 1895No. 795PublishedCited by 14 opinions

The case is stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

HURT, Presiding Judge.

Relator was indicted for swindling, on the 29th day of May, 1895. The indictment was quashed, the court entering an order remanding the relator to the custody of the sheriff until the complaint could be filed against him. The complaint was filed within ten days; namely, on the same day appellant applied by writ of habeas corpus to the district judge to be discharged, contending that the complaint is insufficient. The complaint evidently attempts to charge swindling. Whether the same be sufficient or not can not be determined by writ of habeas corpus. When this complaint…

2Cited by14 opinions

  1. Menefee v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1978
  2. Ex Parte DickersonCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1977
  3. Ex Parte McKayCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1917
  4. Ex Parte MattoxCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1984
  5. Ex Parte CoxCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1908

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API