Thompson v. State
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the Court
LIVINGSTON, Chief Justice.
Although the Court of Appeals states that the question here considered is certified to this court under the provisions of Secs. 87 and 98, Title 13, Code of 1940, we have held that there is now no 'field of operation for said Sec. 87 and that it is no longer operative. However, we will treat the question presented as a certification under Sec. 98. See Kendrick v. Boyd, 255 Ala. 53, 51 So.2d 694.
Article 4, Sec. 104(14), Constitution of Alabama 1901, is correctly set forth in the question presented by the Court of Appeals. Sec. 324, Title 62, Code 1940, is a local law.…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Kendrick v. BoydSupreme Court of Alabama · 1951
- In Re Opinion of the JusticesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1943
- Chancey v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1911
3Cited by6 opinions
- State v. RogersSupreme Court of Alabama · 1967
- State v. LashCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1977
- Waldrop v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1965
- Ex parte CliftonCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1972
- Opinion of the JusticesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1985
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.