Legal Opinion

Henry v. Hiwassee Land Co.

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided June 27, 1980No. 36174PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Nichols, Justice.

The adequacy of notice sent and received by certified mail is the only question presented.

Henry executed in favor of Hiwassee a note in the principal sum of $101,100.00 secured by a deed to secure debt. After Henry’s default under the note, Hiwassee exercised the power of sale in the security deed, and purchased the property at the foreclosure sale for $47,180.00. Hiwassee then filed an application for confirmation of the sale. The trial court issued a rule nisi requiring a copy of the application and a copy of the rule nisi to be served upon Henry at least five days before…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. DeJarnette Supply Co. v. F. P. Plaza, Inc.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1972
  2. Wall v. FEDERAL LAND BANK COLUMBIASupreme Court of Georgia · 1977
  3. Thompson v. LagerquistSupreme Court of Georgia · 1974
  4. Melton v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1978
  5. Dunn v. DunnSupreme Court of Georgia · 1965

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Abba Gana v. Abba GanaSupreme Court of Georgia · 1983
  2. Vlass v. Security Pacific National BankSupreme Court of Georgia · 1993
  3. Five Star Steel Contractors, Inc. v. Colonial Credit UnionCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1993
  4. Ameribank, N.A. v. QuattlebaumSupreme Court of Georgia · 1998
  5. Ameribank, N.A. v. QuattlebaumCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1996

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API