Legal Opinion · Dissent

Bennie Whitehead v. Food Max of Mississippi, Inc., Kmart Corporation v. Paul S. Minor

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided July 17, 2003No. 00-60153Published

1Dissent

KING, Chief Judge,

with whom JERRY E. SMITH and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges, join, dissenting:

The majority, appellate judges all, are plainly exercised about lawyer Paul Minor’s efforts to collect his clients’ judgment against Kmart. In their effort to declare the kind of behavior that will not be accepted by this court, they have short-circuited the inquiry mandated by Rule 11 and our own case law, with potentially far-reaching consequences. I respectfully dissent.

In evaluating a district court’s imposition of sanctions under Rule 11(b)(1), this and other circuits generally look first to the…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. In Re Kunstler.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1990
  2. Rommy Revson, Plaintiff-Counterclaim-Defendant-Appellant, Judd Burstein v. Cinque & Cinque, P.C., Defendant-Counterclaimant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2000
  3. Wilbert J. Sheets, Cross-Appellant v. Yamaha Motors Corporation, U.S.A. And Yamaha Motor Co. Ltd. Of Iwata, Japan, Cross-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1990
  4. Federal Deposit Insurance v. CalhounCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1994
  5. Dan Ivy v. Warren Kimbrough David W. ShullCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1997

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API