Ridgeway v. Corporation Liquidating Co.

When this case was first before the court there appeared to be no judgment that could be reviewed. The record has been so corrected that the case has been considered upon the assignments of error.

The judgment is attacked upon the sole claim that there was error committed by the trial judge in refusing to direct the jury that no recovery could be had upon certain items of the plaintiff’s claim against defendant.

The defendant’s contention was that its undertaking, if any had been proved, was a collateral one to the undertaking of two persons to whom the lumber (for the price of which those…