Legal Opinion

Stringer v. Cendant Mortgage Corp.

Texas Supreme Court

Decided August 24, 2000No. 99-1301PublishedCited by 98 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Baker

This case is before the Court on a certified question from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit. The question is: under the Texas Constitution, may a home-equity lender require the borrower to pay off third-party debt that is not secured by the homestead with the proceeds of the loan? 199 F.3d 190, 192 (5th Cir.1999). We answer the certified question yes.

I. BACKGROUND

The Texas Constitution protects the homestead from forced sale for payment of all debts other than those specifically excepted by the Constitution. See Tex. Const, art. XVI, § 50. In 1997, the citizens of…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. City of Beaumont v. BouillionTexas Supreme Court · 1995
  2. Republican Party of Texas v. DietzTexas Supreme Court · 1997
  3. City of El Paso v. El Paso Community College DistrictTexas Supreme Court · 1986
  4. Hanson v. JordanTexas Supreme Court · 1946
  5. Harris v. City of Fort WorthTexas Supreme Court · 1944

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by98 opinions

  1. Harris County Hospital District v. Tomball Regional HospitalTexas Supreme Court · 2009
  2. Finance Commission v. NorwoodTexas Supreme Court · 2013
  3. Doody v. Ameriquest Mortgage Co.Texas Supreme Court · 2001
  4. In Re Allcat Claims Service, L.P. and John WeaklyTexas Supreme Court · 2011
  5. Wood v. HSBC Bank USA, N.A.Texas Supreme Court · 2016

93 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API