Charles E. Wright & Co. v. Faulkner
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York
ApTeab by the defendants from a judgment of the Municipal Court of the city of New York, eighth district, borough of Manhattan, rendered in favor of the plaintiff.
1Opinion of the CourtDavis, J.
This action was brought to recover for goods sold and delivered. It appears from the complaint that the plaintiff is a foreign corporation. There is no allegation that the plaintiff is a foreign stock corporation, nor does it appear from the complaint that it was doing business within the State of Hew York. The plaintiff obtained judgment for ninety-seven and eighteen one-hundredths dollars. At the close of plaintiff’s case the defendants moved for a nonsuit on three grounds, the last of which was that plaintiff being a foreign corporation had failed to show compliance with section 15 of the…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Charles Roome Parmele Co. v. HaasNew York Court of Appeals · 1902
- South Bay Co. v. HoweyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1906
3Cited by1 opinion
- Alfred J. Brown Seed Co. v. RichardsonNew York Supreme Court · 1907