Molski v. Foster Freeze Paso Robles
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM **
Jarek Molski and Disability Rights, Enforcement, Education Services: Helping You Help Others (collectively referred to as “Molski”) appeal the district court’s denial of state and federal attorneys’ fees and its refusal to sanction Foster Freeze or its counsel. “We review for abuse of discretion the district court’s decision to deny a motion for attorneys’ fees.” Skaff v. Meridien N. Am. Beverly Hills, LLC, 506 F.3d 832, 837 (9th Cir.2007). Legal determinations underlying such decisions are reviewed de novo. Id. A district court’s decision not to grant sanctions is reviewed for…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Buckhannon Board & Care Home, Inc. v. West Virginia Dept. of Health and Human ResourcesSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
- Carter v. StantonSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Graham v. DaimlerChrysler Corp.California Supreme Court · 2005
- Skaff v. Meridien North America Beverly Hills, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
- Hells Canyon Preservation Council v. United States Forest ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by359 opinions
- Alvaro Orosco v. Byung Suk YoonDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2023
- Alvaro Orosco v. Nicholas De La TorreDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2023
- Ana Ventura v. 21128-40 Ventura Holdings, LLCDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2022
- Ana Ventura v. Model Properties, LLCDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2023
- Ana Ventura v. Niko BegakisDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2022
354 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.