People ex rel. Leverson v. Thompson
California Supreme Court
Application for a writ of mandate. The facts are sufficiently stated in the head-note and opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtMcKinstry, J.
The petitioners are not entitled to a mandate directing the secretary of State to certify to the governor that two of them were duly elected Congressmen-at-Iarge, and that each of the others was elected a member of the House of Representatives, in a congressional district created by the Act of the legislature of 1872.
If it should be conceded that the Act of 1883 is invalid, because of nbn-compliance by the legislature with certain formalities required by the Constitution, yet, as appears from the petition and facts of which we take judicial notice, the electors throughout the State did not…
2Cited by10 opinions
- State Ex Inf. McAllister Ex Rel. Lincoln v. BirdSupreme Court of Missouri · 1922
- State ex rel. Patterson v. LentzMontana Supreme Court · 1915
- State Ex Rel. Ferguson v. Superior CourtWashington Supreme Court · 1926
- State ex rel. Sampson v. Superior CourtWashington Supreme Court · 1913
- People ex rel. Anderson v. CzarneckiIllinois Supreme Court · 1924
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.