Legal Opinion
Roberts v. Mayor and Burgesses
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided July 9, 2003No. 02-2126UnpublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
2Per curiam
Clarence P. Roberts (“Roberts”) appeals an order of the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey (“District Court”) dismissing his complaint against the Mayor and Burgesses of the London Borough of Brent (“Brent”) with prejudice for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. For the reasons stated below, we affirm the judgment of the District Court.
Because we write only for the parties, we need not discuss the factual background of this case. Roberts makes three contentions on appeal. First, Roberts argues that the District Court was not authorized to dismiss…
3Cases cited15 opinions
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Friends of the Earth, Inc. v. Laidlaw Environmental Services (TOC), Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Norman Grayson v. Mayview State Hospital Allegheny County Jail Camp Hill Prison United States of America, IntervenorCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2002
- Ruhrgas Ag v. Marathon Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1999
- Richard E. Loux v. B. J. Rhay, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1967
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by7 opinions
- COLES v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION (USDOT)District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2023
- DeAngelis v. HeesDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2026
- FREEMAN v. TD BANKDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2025
- KURELKO v. THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEYDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2025
- MCLEOD v. FIFTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF PADistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2024
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.