Legal Opinion

Bunnell v. Frederick

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided January 19, 1926No. 16156PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

PINKHAM, O.

This is an action instituted by Dan Bunnell, Jr., plaintiff in errojr, plaintiff in the court below, against A. L. Frederick, as defendant, to recover a broker’s commission to which he is alleged to be entitled under a contract for the sale of ia- certain oil and gas lease.

The contract relied on, a copy of which is attached to plaintiff’s amended petition, is as follows:

“August, 1, 1923. Mr. Dan Bunnell, Jr., Tulsa, Okla. Dear Sir: Pursuant to ou,r conversation regarding my lease of 175 acres in sec. 5, township 7 north, range 8 east, Hughes county, Okla., I beg to advise…

2Cited by6 opinions

  1. Artlin Realty Co. v. GlassSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
  2. J. L. Lemmon Co. v. OppenheimerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1932
  3. Shorten v. MuellerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1952
  4. Cales v. PattisonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1941
  5. Braniff v. ButtramSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1950

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API