Legal Opinion
F.V.O. v. Coffee County Department of Human Resources
Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama
Decided December 7, 2012No. 2110398PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MOORE, Judge.
F.V.O. (“the mother”) appeals from separate judgments of the Coffee Juvenile Court (“the juvenile court”) that, among other things, concluded that the most appropriate permanency plan for the mother’s children, M.A.H., A.H., and B.H.V. (sometimes hereinafter referred to collectively as “the children”) is adoption. We affirm.
On April 10, 2009, the Coffee County Department of Human Resources (“DHR”) filed separate petitions in the Coffee Juvenile Court (“the juvenile court”) asserting that the children were dependent and in need of care and supervision. In the petitions, DHR…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Ex Parte BeasleySupreme Court of Alabama · 1990
- Bean v. CraigSupreme Court of Alabama · 1990
- Roe v. ConnDistrict Court, M.D. Alabama · 1976
- New Properties, L.L.C. v. StewartSupreme Court of Alabama · 2004
- HH v. Baldwin County DHRCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2008
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- F.V.O. v. Coffee County Department of Human ResourcesSupreme Court of Alabama · 2013
- F.V.O. v. Coffee County Department of Human ResourcesSupreme Court of Alabama · 2013
- F.V.O. v. Coffee County Department of Human ResourcesCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2016
- F.V.O. v. Coffee County Department of Human ResourcesSupreme Court of Alabama · 2013
- W.A. v. Calhoun County Department of Human ResourcesCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2016